dylan_12 wrote:Glad to see you've got your voice back at last mate!!
hello there dyl welcome on board m8, this is the new forum son, early days yet but giv it a week it will
dylan_12 wrote:Glad to see you've got your voice back at last mate!!
themackem wrote:hopefully the admin here isnt a wanker
themackem wrote:hopefully the admin here isnt a wanker
phil12uk wrote:themackem wrote:hopefully the admin here isnt a wanker
He is...........whilst looking at a picture of himself
i like james and thought your comments were shiteDOHHHHHHH wrote:Aup Mackem !!
Whats with all that grief u were giving me a couple of weeks ago, and whos checkwow
it was the 1st opportunity i had to make a post as i am chat banned...i wouldnt say low blow ... i thought as you had no intensions or was scared to play live you should have stood down and let phil12uk have a crack at it... all said and done now ... but dantb was never going to be beat after anyway imo !!!DOHHHHHHH wrote:Yeh they were made about 8 months ago, bit slow on the uptake werent you?
Just co-incidence u decided to trawl through pages n pages of forum stuff to find it, on the night I got thru on tp?
Low blow fella - fair play though they're my words
DOHHHHHHH wrote:1 - Not sure how you can say I had "no intention of playing live" Not only is it wrong, but even if that was true, I've no idea how you or anyone else could possibly know that.
2- Luton was absolutely nothing to do with total player.
3- Phil was there anyway
DOHHHHHHH wrote:So you wanted me to WITHDRAW from total player, the biggest thing thats happened to me in poker, so Phil could get his buy in refunded????
Is that what you are saying?
DOHHHHHHH wrote:He had every opportunity to win it - same as everyone else who got eliminated.
Ill say it again, Luton was nothing to do with total player - just a chance for them to film everyone at once.
I could have gone to Luton and came first, and still not gotten through.
Anyway - Just wanted to know why you brought that discussion up again, I know now, not interested in getting into TP arguments. Cya at the tables.
expert in to judge the players, and didn't leave it to people like you.??............ sorry but sky did with its final vote...............DOHHHHHHH wrote:Well Im just lucky Tuck were looking at 100s and 100s of my hand ID's then arent I.
Also lucky that sky brought an expert in to judge the players, and didn't leave it to people like you.
Is just such a bullshit attitude to take that - The guy said quite openly that right now, Phil is a better poker player than me. I'm sure alot of people who followed the competition will remember him saying that. He said it about 90 seconds before he made his decision.
He said I have the potential to be better than Phil. - And thats what he went with. Im obviously not far behind Phil, or it would be a non-contest. Phil has been on sky since day 1, and never heard anyone say a bad word about him, so if TUCK was judging us on popularity, again, I wouldnt stand a chance.
Its a wank comment mate, un-informed, and sly, said purely to get a reaction. If you knew what you were on about and give me some reasoning behind your comments it might sting abit, but I doubt it.
Cya in next years comp